Blood Clots—A Threat For Women Using Pills?

Recommend to others!

A research has reported a proof that a particular non-oral contraceptive holds an elevated threat of complicated blood clot than the other non-oral contraceptives. The results recommend that few women must switch from a non-oral product to a contraceptive medicine to aid in reducing their threat. Many researchers have observed the threat of venous thrombosis in females using oral contraceptive pills; however few researches have ascertained the threat in users of non-oral hormonal contraceptive. These products now more persistently generate hormones into the human body to avert pregnancy.

How was the research conducted?

A team which was led by Professor Hvind Lidegaard, reviewed the data collected based on non-hormonal contraceptive consumption and first ever venous thrombosis in almost all non-pregnant Danish women who fell in the age bracket of 15-49 years from the year 2001 to 2010. All these females had no track of either blood clot neither of the cancer ahead the research initiated. Many factors which could have influenced the conclusions, including educational level and age, were considered. The findings are dependent on 9 429 128 volunteers of which around 3 434 were confirmed to be detected of the initial venous thrombosis were tracked.

Threat of venous thrombosis:

The threat of venous thrombosis amid the females who did not make use of any kind of hormonal contraceptive and those fell in the age bracket of 15-49 were on mean 10000 exposures each year. Females consuming combined oral contraceptive drug which contained hormone levonorgestrel had 3 times augmented threat. When contrasted to the non-users of the similar age, the females who made use of the skin patch had 8 times augmented threat. Unlike combined drugs, no decrease in threat was witnessed with the prolonged use of patch or drug.



Speak Your Mind


Current day month ye@r *