Voters Root Candidates With Deep Voices

Recommend to others!

Persuasive speeches are central in promoting for elected office, however do our voices impact the selection of leaders? A recently-printed paper in Proceedings of the Royal Society, demonstrates that males and females vote for men and women candidates who have low pitched voices. Males and females with lower voices are even found to be viewed as stronger, competent and more reliable. Every attribute is considered to influence the voters. Our research asks how the voice pitch influences the selection and to his knowledge, this is the initial to examine the voices of both men and women candidates, says an assistant professor of Political Science, Casey Klofstad. Casey is also a leading author of this research.

The pitch of the candidate matters a lot in his selection:

For instance, we found that males and females perceive lower pitched women voices to be more capable and stronger. In comparison, only males perceived lower pitched men voices to be more potential and stronger. These results recommend that males and females with lower voices might be more popular and successful in accessing the positions of leadership. The conclusions also raise the prospects that the selection of women candidates can be influenced by the fact that females seem to have higher pitched voiced than the males.  This research also displays that since the individuals are free to select their leaders, these selections cannot be recognized in isolation from the biological impact.

The research was conducted to ascertain how individuals select their leaders and if the pitch of voice matters in their selection as leaders. The research is popularly called the Sounds like winner: the pitch of voice impacts the perception of the capacity of leadership in both males and females. The co authors of the research are Susan Peters and Rindy C. Anderson.



Speak Your Mind


Current day month ye@r *